National Association for the Advancement of Colored People (NAACP)

Stay Informed

Join more than 360,000 NAACP activists online, get instant action updates and make a difference.


Supreme Court Gets It Wrong

contribute

The longstanding precedent that in a pay discrimination case, each discriminatory paycheck is a discrete actionable wrong, regardless of when the discriminatory wage was set, is dead.  We know that it is dead because the U.S. Supreme Court pronounced it so in a 5-4 decision issued Tuesday, May 29, 2007, in Ledbetter v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co., 550 U.S. ___ (2007).

Lilly Ledbetter was a supervisor at Goodyear Tire and Rubber’s plant in Gadsden, Alabama, from 1979 until her retirement in 1998.  For most of those years, she worked as an area manager, a position largely occupied by men.  Initially, Ledbetter’s salary was in line with the salaries of men performing substantially similar work.  Over time, however, her pay slipped in comparison to the pay of male area managers with equal or less seniority.  By the end of 1997, Ledbetter was the only woman working as an area manager and the pay discrepancy between Ledbetter and her 15 male counterparts was stark:  Ledbetter was paid $3,727 per month; the lowest paid male area manager received $4,286 per month, the highest paid, $5,236.

Ms. Ledbetter alleged that several supervisors had in the past given her poor evaluations because of her sex; that as a result, her pay had not increased as much as it would have if she had been evaluated fairly; that those past pay decisions affected the amount of her pay throughout her employment; and that by the end of her employment, she was earning significantly less than her male colleagues.

Her problem, according to the Supreme Court majority, was that she was complaining about the current effects of past discrimination that occurred more than 180 days before she filed her EEOC charge.  EEOC (Equal Employment Opportunity Commission) is the federal agency charged with enforcing Title VII of the Civil Rights Act.  The Court said “Ledbetter should have filed an EEOC charge within 180 days after each allegedly discriminatory employment decision was made and communicated to her.”

The moral is that employees who fail to heed this advice can expect to have their claim thrown out as untimely.

The Supreme Court got it wrong in LedbetterNAACP Image Awards - Los Angeles, CA

Feb 20, 2009: NAACP Centennial Celebration - Hilton - New York , NY
Feb 12, 2009: NAACP Image Awards - Los Angeles, CA
Feb 20, 2009: NAACP Centennial Celebration - Hilton - New York , NY
">Help the NAACP correct this bad decision by contacting your U.S. Senator and your Congressperson.  Ask them to examine ways they might clarify Title VII to make it perfectly clear to the Supreme Court that:

  • Employers should not be permitted to benefit from their wrongful act indefinitely merely because the first instance of the repeated wrongdoing was not timely challenged; and
  • Each paycheck that compensates a charging party less than similarly situated employees because of sex violates the plain language of Section 706(e) of Title VII. 

NAACP National Headquarters
4805 Mt. Hope Drive
Baltimore MD 21215

Toll Free: (877) NAACP-98
Local: (410) 580-5777

© 2008 NAACP
All Rights Reserved