Advocacy & Litigation

The path to justice requires that we challenge federal, state, and local laws, statutes, and policies to ensure equal protection.

CURRENT LITIGATION

Voting Rights in California

On November 19, 2025, the U.S. District Court for the Central District of California granted the Motion to Intervene filed by the NAACP and NAACP California-Hawaii State Conference ("NAACP CA-HI") in United States of America v. Weber, et al. This lawsuit stems from the fact that the U.S. Department of Justice's ("DOJ") launched an unprecedented campaign, demanding unfettered access to state voter files, which include sensitive and personal information about each registered voter. As part of that campaign, DOJ sued states, including California, that refused to comply with DOJ's request.

Outdoor View of Building Columns with Sun and Shadows

Redistricting in Texas

On November 18, 2025, the NAACP Texas State Conference ("NAACP TX") had a major victory in League of Latin American Citizens, et al. v. Abbott in the U.S. District Court for the Western District of Texas. Earlier this year, President Trump began urging Texas to redraw its U.S. House map to create five additional Republican seats. The court did not afford Texas an opportunity to enact a new replacement legal map, noting that it was highly unlikely that the Governor could call a special session and that the Legislature could draw and pass a new map in that special session before the candidate filing deadline of December 8, 2025.

Voting Rights in Georgia

On November 18, 2025, the NAACP Georgia State Conference and the NAACP Houston County Branch filed an unopposed motion to join Driver et al. v. Houston County Board of Elections, et al. The lawsuit challenges the at-large method of elections for the Houston County Board of Commissioners. The lawsuit seeks to replace the at-large system with a single-member district system.

MAKING LAWS WORK FOR US

A thoughtful look at American history reveals that the nation's laws were never meant to serve Black Americans. But we strive to make the laws work for us through litigation at the national and local levels.

Through affirmative litigation, we aim to further our mission to ensure equitable treatment and opportunities when it comes to voting rights, education, economic empowerment, criminal justice, and health, including environmental justice. We initiate lawsuits and join as plaintiffs in state and federal cases.

We have, and will continue to, file cases that fight:

Unjust federal, state local statutes regulations
Discriminatory policies, practices procedures
Unlawful misconduct by public officers, private individuals, and companies that threaten civil rights

We don't do this work alone. We may partner with other civil rights organizations, law firms, and law schools to secure the resources necessary to assess and prosecute cases.

Recent Filings

We're using the court system to fight efforts to disenfranchise Black voters, hold public officials accountable, and ensure civil rights. Read more about current cases.

The NAACP is joining with LDF in filing an amicus brief in Fairfax County Sch. Bd. and Arlington Cty. Sch. Bd v. McMahon, now pending in the Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals. This case has implications for Black public school students in Fairfax and Arlington counties in Virginia and for beneficiaries of public funding across the Fourth Circuit.
On August 25, 2025, the U.S. Department of Education("DE") announced it was placing Alexandria City Public Schools, Arlington Public Schools, Fairfax County Public Schools, Loudoun County Public Schools, and Prince William County Public Schools (the Divisions) in Northern Virginia on high-risk status because the schools recognized "gender identity" with regard to bathrooms. DE halted all federal funding flowing to these districts, forcing the districts to pay out of pocket first, then submit requests to the federal government for reimbursement. Fairfax and Arlington challenged the determination of their status as high risk.
The District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia dismissed the case for lack of jurisdiction, concluding that the Supreme Court's recent decision in National Institutes of Health v. American Public Health Ass'n requires that all claims related to grant terminations go to the Court of Federal Claims pursuant to the Tucker Act. In the amicus brief, we would argue that this is a broad overread of the NIH decision, which concluded that internal guidance does not fall within the purview of the Tucker Act even when it relates to or results in grant terminations.
It is our position that the "high-risk" designation is akin to this sort of internal guidance. Sister courts' interpretation of the NIH decision supports this understanding. Under the decision being appealed, DE could also stop all funding to school districts based upon the administration's announced views of what constitutes racial discrimination, and such decisions could not be challenged in district court.
Read the full filing.

Black Female Election Workers - tallying election votes

Voting Rights Victory

The Indiana NAACP, along with the League of Women Voters of Indiana, challenged Acts 442 and 334 in court and won protection for the state's voters. The two voter purge laws aimed to allow Indiana election officials to cancel voter registrations without communication or compliance with the National Voter Registration Act (NVRA) process.
The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit ruled that Acts 442 and 334 violate the NVRA, which prohibits states from removing voters unless voters opted for removal or by going through the established process of the NVRA.

The coalition filed a suit in YEAR to stop Act 442, which allowed election officials to obtain data from a third-party database to determine voter eligibility in Indiana without notice to the voter. Similarly, Act 334 aimed to use the Indiana Data Enhancement Association (IDEA) to identify duplicate voter registrations and allow election officials to remove a voter from Indiana's voter rolls without proper notification or consent.

Learn More

Voting Rights in California

Redistricting in Texas

Voting Rights in Georgia

Fairfax County School Board and Arlington County School Board v. McMahon

Join the Fight

Make an Impact